Plenty of people whinge about Pitchfork having it's own snooty brand of criticism, but just like Spiderman, P4K have learned that with great power etc...
Destroying buzz acts has become a bit of a raison-d'etre for the site since it's inception, and The Ting Tings are the latest to feel
the pointy edges. You know it's gonna be bad when the review opens with "the Ting Tings are selling anti-establishment "fuck you"'s by the bottle." Comparisons with Tony Basil and a 3.8 review ensue.
Which makes for a good review, but leaves a bit of a whiff afterwards. For such a taste-making site, why has Pitchfork waited so long for a review? The album's been doing the rounds for a few months now, surely they should have had a review when the record bowed in the UK. Instead the credibility of the review suffers, because it looks like Pitchfork are giving this act an easy ride by delaying a review that could certainly have influenced their reception, but is now rendered inert.
Has Pitchfork decided to start playing the game? A little more backscratching to help out their video-channel...